Old Ways

Medieval Gong Farmers ‘Lived’ in Cesspits

Gong farmers, an integral but often overlooked part of British history, played a crucial role in the sanitation and health of medieval and early modern communities. Their profession, while unglamorous, was essential in urban centers before the advent of modern sewage systems. The term “gong farmer” originated in Tudor England, but the role existed long before that period.

Gong-farmers had the task of scooping up excrement into baskets and wheelbarrows, then transporting it to be either buried or used as fertilizer in fields.

The occupation of gong-farming was not only malodorous but also hazardous; a notable incident occurred in 1325 when Richard the Raker tragically drowned after falling into a cesspit. Despite these risks, gong-farmers were compensated fairly well for their work, although they were often socially distanced due to the nature of their job.

Contents

Despite the societal stigma and the unpleasant nature of their work, gong farmers often received relatively substantial financial compensation, reflecting the essential nature of their role. This remuneration acknowledged not only the physical labor involved but also the health risks and social ostracism they endured.

Eighteenth-century flyer advertising the services of John Hunt, nightman and rubbish carter, showing two men carrying one of the pipes used to remove human excrement
Gong Farmers: Eighteenth-century flyer advertising the services of John Hunt, nightman and rubbish carter, showing two men carrying one of the pipes used to remove human excrement

Gong farmers were typically paid per cesspit they cleared, with their income depending on the number of jobs they completed. In some instances, this payment structure allowed gong farmers to earn a decent living, especially when compared to other manual labor jobs of the time.

Read More: Coopers Were Crucial Craftsmen, but Why?

The financial rewards could be significant enough to offset, at least partially, the social disadvantages that came with the profession.Furthermore, an interesting economic aspect of their work was the occasional retrieval of lost valuables from the cesspits.

During their cleaning operations, gong farmers sometimes found items accidentally dropped into privies, such as coins or jewelry. In many cases, they were entitled to keep these findings, adding a potentially lucrative, albeit irregular, bonus to their earnings.

However, the economic stability of a gong farmer could be precarious. The demand for their services, while generally consistent, could fluctuate, and the hazards of their work posed risks not just to their health but also to their ability to continue working. Additionally, the need for gong farmers varied between regions and with the development of urban infrastructure.

Read More: River Piddle, it is No Laughing Matter

Despite the potential for relatively good pay, the profession of gong-farming did not see a rush of volunteers, primarily due to the social implications and the nature of the work. Those who did take up this profession often found themselves in a niche yet vital economic role within their communities.

The economic aspects of gong-farming in historical Britain were marked by a unique blend of relatively high remuneration, potential for additional earnings through found valuables, and the inherent risks and social challenges of the profession.

Origins and Role of Gong Farmers

The origins and role of gong farmers in Britain are deeply rooted in the medieval era, a time when burgeoning urban centres grappled with the growing challenge of sanitary waste management.

Gong farmers were sanitation workers in medieval and early modern Britain, responsible for removing human excrement from cesspits and privies.
Gong farmers were sanitation workers in medieval and early modern Britain, responsible for removing human excrement from cesspits and privies.

Gong farmers, named after the Old English word ‘gang’ meaning ‘to go’, were essentially the sanitation workers of their day, tasked with a job that was as crucial as it was unpleasant – the removal of human excrement from cesspits and privies.

Read More: Dovecotes One Thousand Years of History

In the densely populated towns and cities of medieval Britain, where public health and cleanliness were major concerns, the role of the gong farmer became increasingly indispensable. With rudimentary sewage systems, if any, most waste was collected in cesspits or privies located near or under houses. These would inevitably fill up and required regular cleaning to prevent overflow and contamination, a task that fell to the gong farmers.

Gong Farmers

Operating predominantly under the cover of darkness, partly due to the malodorous nature of their work and partly to spare the public from the unsightly business of waste removal, gong farmers played a vital role in maintaining the basic hygiene of urban environments.

The work was not only physically demanding but also required a level of resilience to handle the conditions they worked under. Despite this, gong farming was an organised and recognised profession, often regulated by local authorities who understood the necessity of this service.

Gong farmers typically carried out their work between the hours of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m.
Gong farmers typically carried out their work between the hours of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m.

Interestingly, the status of gong farmers in society was paradoxical. While their service was essential, the nature of their work meant they were often ostracised or looked down upon. Nonetheless, their position was sometimes considered lucrative, given the payment structures and the occasional retrieval of lost valuables from the cesspits.

The Social Stigma

The occupation of gong-farming in Britain, though essential, was enveloped in a significant social stigma due to its association with human waste and the resultant foul conditions.

Read More: Conway Castle and the Smallest House in Britain

Gong farmers were indispensable for maintaining public health and hygiene in the densely populated urban areas of medieval and early modern Britain, yet the nature of their work, involving the removal of excrement from cesspits and privies, placed them on the fringes of society.

Despite the crucial service they provided, gong farmers were often ostracised and kept at arm’s length by the rest of the community. The unpleasant odours that clung to them and the unclean nature of their work led to their social isolation.

Nightmen

They operated predominantly under the cover of night, both to spare the public from the unsightly and malodorous aspects of their work and to mitigate the risk of spreading the filth and odour in crowded urban spaces. This nocturnal aspect of their job earned them the alternative moniker of ‘nightmen’.

However, this social distancing was juxtaposed against the fact that without their services, urban centres would have been at severe risk of disease and pestilence.

A Garderobe was the name for a medieval toilet

Overfilled cesspits posed a significant health hazard, and the gong farmers’ role in preventing such overflow was vital. They were the unsung, albeit essential, custodians of public health in a time when understanding of sanitation and disease was limited.

Moreover, the social perception of gong farmers was not uniformly negative across all regions and periods. In some cases, their contribution to public health was recognised, and they were compensated accordingly.

Read More: Plague Stones, Keep Your Eye Out for Them

Nevertheless, the nature of their work invariably led to a certain degree of social ostracism, a paradox that highlights the complex relationship between essential public services and societal attitudes in historical contexts.

In essence, the role of gong farmers in British history presents a study in contrasts: essential yet unacknowledged, well-compensated yet socially distanced. Their story underscores the often unseen yet vital work that underpins the functioning of societies, particularly in the context of urban public health and sanitation.

Gong Farmers: Legal Regulations and Restrictions

The profession of gong-farming, while necessary, was subject to stringent legal regulations and restrictions, reflecting the delicate balance between the need for their services and the desire to maintain public health and decency. These legal frameworks were designed to control not only the operation of gong-farming but also the conduct and lifestyle of the gong farmers themselves.

Read More: Plague Crosses, What Exactly are They?

Local authorities, recognising the importance of sanitary waste removal yet mindful of the potential health hazards it posed, imposed rules dictating when and how gong farmers could work. One common regulation was that gong farmers were only permitted to work during the night.

"Gong" was a term that denoted both the privy itself and its contents.
“Gong” was a term that denoted both the privy itself and its contents.

This restriction aimed to minimise the exposure of the general public to the unpleasant sights and odours associated with their work, as well as to reduce the risk of spreading contamination through the densely populated streets.

Additionally, there were specific regulations regarding the disposal of the waste. Gong farmers were typically required to transport the collected excrement outside the boundaries of the town or city, where it could be disposed of safely or used as fertiliser in agricultural fields.

Read More: The History of Medieval Moats

This practice was crucial in preventing the spread of diseases and maintaining a semblance of cleanliness within urban environments.

In some areas, gong farmers were mandated to live in designated locations, often on the outskirts of towns or cities, due to the nature of their work. This segregation was another measure to prevent contamination and maintain public health but also served to reinforce the social ostracisation they faced.

Economic Aspects and Remuneration

Moreover, gong farmers who failed to adhere to these regulations or caused accidents, such as spillage or improper disposal, could face severe penalties. This strict enforcement underscores the delicate nature of their work and the fine line they had to tread between providing an essential service and maintaining public health and safety.

While their services were indispensable, the potential health risks and social implications of their profession necessitated a stringent regulatory framework to ensure that their work was conducted safely and with minimal disruption to the broader community.

Read More: The Story of Our Prehistoric Woodlands

The remuneration for gong farmers fluctuated throughout the medieval period. According to historical documents from the 15th century, the standard payment was typically two shillings per ton, which would be equivalent to around £90 in today’s money.

Interestingly, there are records indicating that some gong farmers were compensated with pounds of candle wax. Notably, it is said that one gong farmer who worked for Queen Elizabeth I was paid in brandy.

The economic aspects and remuneration associated with the profession of gong-farming in historical Britain present an intriguing paradox.

Read More: Britain’s Roman Roads, Their Development

Despite the societal stigma and the unpleasant nature of their work, gong farmers often received relatively substantial financial compensation, reflecting the essential nature of their role. This remuneration acknowledged not only the physical labor involved but also the health risks and social ostracism they endured.

Financial Rewards

Gong farmers were typically paid per cesspit they cleared, with their income depending on the number of jobs they completed. In some instances, this payment structure allowed gong farmers to earn a decent living, especially when compared to other manual labor jobs of the time.

The financial rewards could be significant enough to offset, at least partially, the social disadvantages that came with the profession. Furthermore, an interesting economic aspect of their work was the occasional retrieval of lost valuables from the cesspits.

Read More: Corpse Roads, Coffin Roads, a Medieval Legacy

During their cleaning operations, gong farmers sometimes found items accidentally dropped into privies, such as coins or jewelry. In many cases, they were entitled to keep these findings, adding a potentially lucrative, albeit irregular, bonus to their earnings.

However, the economic stability of a gong farmer could be precarious. The demand for their services, while generally consistent, could fluctuate, and the hazards of their work posed risks not just to their health but also to their ability to continue working. Additionally, the need for gong farmers varied between regions and with the development of urban infrastructure.

Despite the potential for relatively good pay, the profession of gong-farming did not see a rush of volunteers, primarily due to the social implications and the nature of the work. Those who did take up this profession often found themselves in a niche yet vital economic role within their communities.

Decline of Gong Farmers

Once crucial in the maintenance of urban hygiene in historical Britain, witnessed a gradual decline and transition with the advent of modern sewage and sanitation systems. This change was particularly pronounced during the 19th century, a period marked by significant advancements in public health awareness and infrastructure.

Dorchester vicar, Henry Moule (1801-1880) worked for better sanitation in the squalid slums of Fordington parish (Dorchester, Dorset). Conditions were so bad that sewage swept past doorsteos to a local pond. Infected water spread cholera in the epidemic of 1854.

The introduction of sewage networks and the construction of underground sewers in urban areas radically transformed waste management, rendering the traditional role of gong farmers increasingly obsolete.

This shift was further accelerated by technological innovations such as the water closet, which gradually replaced privies and cesspits in homes and public spaces.

Read More: Wayside Crosses, What Exactly Are They?

These new systems, designed to transport waste directly to sewage treatment facilities, significantly reduced the need for manual removal of excrement. As a result, the demand for gong farmers’ services declined, leading to a reduction in their numbers and the eventual phasing out of the profession.

Technological Advancements

The transition was not instantaneous, as the adoption of modern sanitation infrastructure varied across regions and was influenced by economic and social factors.

However, by the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the occupation of gong farming had largely disappeared in Britain. The few remaining practitioners found their skills and services redundant in an era of rapidly evolving urban sanitation.

Read More: Ducking Stools Were Used in Medieval England

This transition, while a positive development for public health, also marked the end of a centuries-old profession. The decline of gong farming reflected the broader changes in society and technology, highlighting the evolution of urban living and the continuous pursuit of improved living conditions.

The story of the gong farmers, therefore, is not just about the demise of a profession but also about the progress of public health practices and the impact of technological advancements on traditional occupations.

Gong Farmer, Cultural Impact

While their occupation was often marginalised and stigmatised, the existence and necessity of gong farming highlighted key aspects of life in past societies, particularly in urban settings.

Gong farmers, in their capacity as early sanitation workers, played a pivotal role in the development of waste management systems. Their work, while unglamorous, was vital in preventing the spread of disease and maintaining a basic level of hygiene in crowded towns and cities.

Read More: Crinkle Crankle Walls, What Are They?

This aspect of their role contributed significantly to the understanding of public health and hygiene, a field that was still in its infancy. The challenges faced by gong farmers underscored the importance of developing more effective and humane waste management solutions, which eventually led to the modern sewage systems we rely on today.

Furthermore, the social ostracisation of gong farmers reflects historical attitudes towards cleanliness, labour, and social hierarchy. Their treatment by society serves as a reminder of how essential yet undervalued certain professions can be, a notion that resonates even in contemporary contexts. The story of the gong farmers is a testament to the often unseen yet crucial work that underpins the functioning of societies.

In literature and folklore, the figure of the gong farmer sometimes emerges, albeit infrequently, symbolising the less palatable aspects of urban life. These references, while rare, provide insights into the perceptions and realities of everyday life in historical periods.